The Nikon full frame (24x36mm) rangefinder range started in the early 50s when they released the Nikon S. Even though it was an advanced model at the time it could only take 50mm lenses (It would take other lenses with accessory viewfinders).
Today we have had a play with the New Leica Q (TYP 116). We are very impressed with the feel and the handling of the camera but how does it compare to the well established Leica flagship system?
This large capacity camera was capable of taking 250 shots without the need to change film. It was often used by professional sports photographers and wandering beach photographers. It was very convenient to have the large capacity. The special film spools allowed partially exposed film to be cut and removed.
Just a quick comparison of the three, all shot in JPEG at iso 200 with all the image settings set to standard.
We start with a brief comparison of the two classics. A lot of our customers spend hours trying to decide between the two: We used the lenses on the same camera (Leica M typ 240) with the same settings. Raw files were developed in Adobe Lightroom without any sharpening or other alterations.
First the centre of the frame: We have created this blog so that we can share some test images and our opinions about photographic equipment.
Working at Richard Caplan's shop we are very lucky to have access to lots of different interesting lenses and cameras. Sometimes we get to try rare equipment. Reviews and sample photos are not always easily available so we have decided to share the stuff we get to play with. We are not sponsored by any manufacturers, however it's not a secret that we favour German and Swedish cameras :) We will sometimes be comparing ancient equipment to the latest, testing things that have not even been made in this century or doing other things that do not necessarily make sense. We welcome any suggestions. |
Visit our e-shop at www.richardcaplan.co.uk
Archives |